Sustainability

Sustainability vs. America


News Worth Mentioning

Latest News

News from Europe

Science Tech Med News

Climate Change
A Political Tool


Second Amendment News

Socialism News

Mauldin City News

Posts on Twitter

Political Cartoons

Be sure to check out
our list of other
News Sources
Worth Mentioning




privacy search engine

Friends dont't let
friends get tracked


Go to top

Political Commentary
Home Page


The $88 Trillion
World Economy


Remembering 9/11

President Trump's
First Three Years


All Skills Are Learned
and the Method Is Key


The Foundations
of Freedom


Everyone is Smart but Trump

Climate Change
A Political Tool


Politics Trumps Economics Redux

Who Are the Good Guys?

Slavery Today!

Justice Clarence Thomas and the Lost Constitution

Politics Trumps Economics

The World's Second Constitution

Why America is Great

President Trump
in pictures


US stocks a better buy

Economic Arteries

The Left against
the First Amendment


Is a Stock-Market
Bubble Coming?


Individual Rights
States' Powers


Thanksgiving Toast
to the Old Breed


Honoring
George Washington


Business As Usual
at the White House


Patriotism

Who Gets To Decide?

America Rebounds!

The Trump Economic
Paradigm Change


What's wrong
with the EU


The Trump Presidency

The Election -
What Happened?
First Monday speech
5 December 2016


Mike Rowe on
Burning the Flag


Socialism means
giving your freedom
to the government


Second Amendment

Responsibility

This is Hillary

Where We Live

Honorable Politicians

Education

Citizen Politicians

So You Want Socialism?

Authorized Not Imposed

Against Rights and Freedom

Sustainability
vs. America


Speech to County GOP

The Economy

Being America

The Individual
vs. Statism


To-Do List

Unite or Die

Lost Trust

Quotable Quotes

Go to top



13 June 2012

You hear a lot about "Sustainability" -- government controlling and curtailing the actions of people to act for some "noble" purpose. "Sustainability", along with the goal of "being Green", is the cry of Environmentalists.

It should be unnecessary to point out that the U.S. is founded on the rights of the individual to his life, liberty, and property -- his happiness. The people (not the government) held the Constitutional Convention in 1787 to put together a constitution that institutes a government with certain limited powers -- and no more.

Unlike in Europe, the U.S. government does not have the right to change the Constitution that authorizes its existence and actions. The Constitution is above the government, which exists only to protect the rights of the people who authorized its existence for that purpose.

To repeat, the whole purpose of a government is only to protect the rights of the individuals in that country. In contrast, "sustainability" is something completely opposite -- the government's forceful determination of which citizens can do what, based on its permission. That is wholly antithetical to the foundation of the U.S. (despite certain people who would like to change that).

Sustainability is incompatible with everything the U.S. stands for -- the lives and well-being of the individuals who live there.

Consider these points:

1. "Sustainability" replaced "global warming" in the Environmentalist agenda when it was shown (1) that global warming was not occurring and (2) that their data was exposed as lies. Environmentalism is a system of beliefs, with all the same hallmarks as religions, communism, fascism, socialism, atheism, etc. If someone wants to switch his beliefs, fine, but be clear that it is done deliberately and by choice, and not by stealth.

In other words, Environmentalism falls under the First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" -- Remember that the next time you hear of it being taught in your schools.

2. "Sustainability" assumes finite resources. The idea of finite resources comes directly from Karl Marx, and Marx was completely wrong. Yet Marxism is the foundation for every government structure in the EU today. Government controls (in the name of Sustainability or socialism or simple dictatorship) erode and destroy economic growth.

Experience agrees with theory: the periods of greatest growth have been in those times and places of the least government control. Economic growth will continue or increase to the degree that people live in the absence of government controls. In contrast, Sustainability inevitably destroys growth. People (i.e., and corporations) who are able to compete in a free marketplace for access to available resources will invent alternatives to any limitations, and make those solutions competitive in the market -- that is economic progress, and it is unending -- limitless -- as long as government does not intervene.

3. Europe is slowly deteriorating. The EU is a "statist" organization -- i.e., dedicated to preserving its members' governments, not the rights of individuals (in contrast to the U.S.). Again, theory agrees with experience: the EU is inherently doomed to failure, and the current Greece / Spain / Italy mess is only one symptom of that ongoing decline. Sustainability is just one more tool by which EU governments limit and channel peoples' lives, destroying economic progress and future prosperity.

4. The U.S. is better off economically than the EU because its people are more free to pursue their own interests. Changes to that relative comparison will be determined by political changes in either location. Politics always trumps economics.

European governments are still effectively unchanged from where they have been for about a thousand years, far behind the political progress made in the U.S. in the past 300. The greater the degree to which a government defends (or fails to defend) the rights of the individual has direct consequences for the economic well-being of the individuals it governs -- which is the same thing as economic progress.

That is why Sustainability is wrong. Sustainability is destructive -- to economic prosperity, which is to say: to life itself.

-- Scott

Go to top